tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1143723380059090027.post2514923241336308001..comments2009-02-09T05:45:15.374-08:00Mike Calvohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16229912559128745326noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1143723380059090027.post-66452482519168998872008-09-08T10:49:00.000-07:002008-09-08T10:49:00.000-07:00Two things.<BR/><BR/>First, Dr. Maurer's name is spelled M-A-R-C. Secondly, I applaud TheBlindTech's observation that Apple didn't receive a carbon-copy of the memo, but that's probably because Apple isn't an accessibility software company. Should Apple be counted in the choice consideration? Yes. It should. But I don't think that a wide-spread attack on the NFB is necessary just because Dr. Maurer didn't think about Apple in his list of accessible technologies. To be honest, Apple is a hot topic in the blind community which has created much discussion. TheBlindTech might be interested in reading the System Access Users' Forum posts regarding Apple and I-Tunes. It's interesting stuff.<BR/><BR/>Respectfully,<BR/>Jedilonejedihttp://lonejedi.livejournal.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1143723380059090027.post-78716958476626994622008-09-04T14:24:00.000-07:002008-09-04T14:24:00.000-07:00and this is why no one takes the NFB serious, he sits here and CC's everyone but Apple. not even giving them recconizing its access tech, but yes, the blind need a choice huh marky? just laim, straight laim indeed.<BR/><BR/>Gabe Vega<BR/>CEO<BR/>The BlindTechs Network<BR/>www.theblindtechsnetwork.com<BR/>623-565-9357TheBlindTechhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15010466891775630118noreply@blogger.com